Veteran Conservative cabinet minister Dave Hancock had good news and bad news for Guy Smith, who was acclaimed yesterday to another two-year term as president of the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees.
As the minister in charge of Premier Alison Redford’s unwieldy Ministry of Human Services, Mr. Hancock told the Calgary Herald Thursday the provincial government has no plans just now to privatize or download onto municipalities any of the province’s many social programs and services.
That’s good news for Mr. Smith, who had to be deeply concerned when Premier Redford started talking openly about her privatization ideas toward the end of the Conservative leadership campaign, because it means the government will likely put off at least until after the next general election what has to be a nightmare scenario for the president of the province’s largest public service union.
But it’s bad news for Mr. Smith because it means privatization of social services likely remains on the government’s wish list, if not on its agenda.
As Mr. Hancock told the Herald: “It’s too early to really set timelines. I mean, that’s certainly a goal. Obviously she set it up as a goal and I think we want to have over the next six months a very clear indication of what the possibilities of this department might be.”
That doesn’t sound like someone who’s completely ruling out the idea of a pretty extensive program of privatization – which, since we’re talking about the services that are essential to Alberta’s weakest and most vulnerable citizens that are more professionally and accountably delivered by public employees, sounds like a pretty bad idea.
Indeed, the very notion of the ridiculously massive Human Services Ministry – made up of such former ministries and programs as Children’s Services, Employment, Homelessness, Seniors and Community Supports – lends itself to conspiracy theories. It may have simply been set up as a public-relations gambit to reduce the number of cabinet ministers, but it sure sounds like a bunch of “assets” slated for the chopping block.
The potential for bad news is why AUPE could move more than 1,000 participants in its annual general meeting down the street to the steps of the Alberta Legislature yesterday afternoon to blow whistles and generally raise a hullabaloo about the prospect of more privatization.
It made for a great show, although it’s highly doubtful anyone inside the august old legislative building was paying attention – after all, as so often seems to be the case in that place, the lights were on, but no one was home.
However, since these are not normal times for Alberta, it behooves everyone on both sides of this privatization brouhaha to pay attention to what the other guys are saying.
From the perspective of public service unions like Mr. Smith’s, it means first that they need to be realistic about who Ms. Redford is.
It’s almost as if everyone was so enthusiastic about her pledge to defend public health care – or so frightened of then-frontrunner Gary Mar’s suggestion he’d be open to health care privatization – that they forgot to look at what she had to say about other potential targets for private sector mischief.
They shouldn’t have. Her privatization plans, after all, were all there on her campaign website in black and white (black and green, actually) from Day 1 of her campaign.
It also means that supporters of public services need to be prepared not just to blow whistles and yell through bullhorns – although that may yet turn out to be the most effective tactics in their arsenal – but also to try talking with the Redford Government.
After all, thanks to three strong presidents over the past decade and a half, AUPE has been a remarkable success story – growing to close to 80,000 members since the dark days of the mid-1990s when premier Ralph Klein went after public employees wearing a hockey mask and wielding a chainsaw – metaphorically speaking – reducing AUPE to well under 40,000 members.
A significant part of the secret to AUPE’s growth and success during this period was the willingness of presidents Dan MacLennan, Doug Knight and Guy Smith to talk to the government as well as to yell at it.
Unfortunately for Mr. Smith, some of the government people he spent time talking to are no longer in Ms. Redford’s cabinet, so he is going to have to work on that relationship, as well as keep his powder dry.
From the Redford Government’s perspective, its strategists need to remember that talk like the premier’s privatization musings is not normal chitchat to any of the public service unions whose members, acting on their own, arguably pushed her campaign over the top.
Despite high support in public opinion polls right now, in the next general election Ms. Redford likely to face the most energized and enthusiastic opposition since the Liberals under Laurence Decore in the early 1990s. So she’s going to need the support of those public servants’ votes again if she wants to succeed in the election that really counts. And she’s sure not going to need noisy and inconvenient public demonstrations in the run-up to a provincial election.
As has been said here before, public service union members are notoriously hard to tell what to do. Indeed, it’s a dirty little secret of Alberta politics that a majority of Alberta public employees happily vote Conservative most of the time. But they will act in their own interests if threatened, just as they did when they felt they were threatened by Mr. Mar.
And since the depredations of the Klein Era are still fresh in many memories – and Alberta is still suffering from the damage he did to health care, human services, environmental protection and the like – Ms. Redford’s recent talk sounds threatening indeed.
So it makes sense for Ms. Redford to work on the relationship too, and to do it sometime in the next six months.
A good place to start would be for her to make a clear commitment not to download or privatize essential government services to children, seniors and the poor, just as she promised to defend true public health care in her leadership campaign.
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.
5 comments:
So, is the 'approximately 1000' AUPE members a verbal version of the Liberals photo cropping?
I'm sure an unbiased count would have put the number closer to 500.
And come on David, while many peopele listen to the views of individual Albertans, why would you expect anyone to pay attention to the calmoring and whistles of a union.
Hey, not even the mebership had enough interest to run for the leadership position!
It's amusing that you are right up there with the neosoc foilhat people promoting a conspiracy to privatize. Next thing you'll be claiming Jack's death was caused by CSIS!
Hey, as an aside, I note Jack hasn't risen yet. He's not waiting until May 1st, is he?
Looked like about 1,000 to me and I was there. I'll stand by my crowd estimate. However, even if that count is high, the crowd was somewhat better than the 13 people, counting himself, that Dr. Sherman drew to the same location. In fairness to the Liberals, though, some pretty big movements have grown from an event attended by 13.
As for Mr. or Ms. Anonymous's accusation I'm in there with "neosoc foilhat people promoting a conspiracy to privatize," Ms. Redford's actual words on her website were as follows: "“Within six months, I want to identify services that can be transferred to community leadership or privatized.” No tinfoil hat is necessary to conclude that when she said "privatized," what she meant was "privatized." Personally, I think it would be foolish to assume that she didn't mean what she said.
Glad to see you at the demonstration, David. I want to clarify however that every time Guy Smith has spoken with the media said he wanted to have a meeting with the new Premier as soon as possible so she can clearly state what her plans are. I guess you missed that part of the speech.
Privatization was in Ms. Redford's platform and she has yet to explicitly back away from that position. AUPE knew that privatization was part of the platform, and on the very first working day after she was elected leader we expressed our concerns in a news release. When the issue was brought up again in a Herald story four days later it was prudent for us to send the Premier a clear statement that we would not stand by while our members' jobs and the services they provide to Albertans in those jobs were at risk. We put the issue on the media's radar.
There is plenty of time to talk with the Premier and develop a relationship with the new cabinet, but we had to be clear about our position on privatization right out of the gates.
@Anonymous 5:58 PM - People run against an leader when they are unhappy with his or her leadership. Guy Smith has the backing of his membership.
Good points all, Mark. That said, and I can't speak for AUPE of course, I know that many of us as individuals missed Ms. Redford's privatization policy statement on her website for several weeks until she gave her Herald interview simply because we hadn't read her platform with care. There's a lesson here for everyone, obviously. Ms. Redford, in my view, succeeded at appearing to be all things to all people throughout her campaign. Now she has to develop actual policies, however, so it is easier to suss out what she really believes. As I have said repeatedly, the news is not necessarily good from a progressive point of view.
So, it is no conspiracy! If a person has opnely said what they want to do, why place it in the context of a conspiracy, except with the hope of demonizing the issue. Hardly rational for someone who used to be a journalist.
Post a Comment