The Calgary Sun’s front page Saturday morning. Below: Sun columnist Rick Bell; Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi; a technician demonstrates the proper procedure for handling a typical Sun story.Has former Alberta premier Ed Stelmach’s bad luck rubbed off on newly installed Premier Alison Redford?
She’s been premier for, what? … two days now, and the Calgary Sun reports that a company owned by her
new chief of staff, the political operator credited with her come-from-behind Progressive Conservative leadership victory over Gary Mar, “owes more than $600,000, most of it to the University of Calgary, and hasn’t coughed up a cent in court-ordered judgments.”The daily tabloid ran the story under a brutal headline: “Chief of Stiff!” It was accompanied by a smiling studio portrait of Stephen Carter and a story by columnist Rick Bell about the financial woes of Mr. Carter’s defunct company, Carter McRae Events.
The Sun went to town with the story and the effect was ugly. Interestingly, the Calgary Herald – recipient of that 22,000-name PC Party membership list back in September that helped the Redford campaign – is so far ignoring it.
Now, the cast of characters involved in this brouhaha may provide some insight into what is still a developing situation.
The Sun is a tabloid newspaper that in recent years, apparently on the orders of its parent company in Quebec, has taken a hard turn to the right. During the last federal election campaign, it would be fair to say that the Sun moved from the mild rightward bias typical of all Canadian mainstream media to the use of its news columns to campaign openly for Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s federal Conservatives.
The Sun is now clearly lining itself up with the far-right Wildrose Party led by former Fraser Institute apparatchik Danielle Smith, and it would be reasonable to expect the same heavy bias in its news stories about the upcoming Alberta provincial election, expected next sp
It would be fair to say that any Sun story on a Canadian political topic needs to be handled with a long set of tongs, lest it emit radioactive isotopes.
At the same time, Mr. Bell is a columnist with a history of breaking good stories and getting his facts right. He writes and speaks in a highly colourful fashion with a strong point of view, which it would be fair to say is not dissimilar from that of his employer. But he dots his i’s and crosses his t’s and, as we used to say in the newspaper business, “he knows how to spell cat.” So the chances are good that, whatever you may think of their interpretation, in this case the Sun’s facts are right.
If Mr. Bell likes to be called “The Dinger,” well, Alberta Diary has nothing to say about that.
Mr. Carter, meanwhile, has a reputation as a political gun for hire. Not only did he work for Ms. Redford, he is credited with the unexpected mayoral victory of Naheed Nenshi in Calgary last October. The cerebral, personable and small-l liberal Mr. Nenshi, Canada’s first big-city Muslim mayor, is now said to be polling better than any major-city mayor in Canada – at 86 per cent – and is therefore likely to remain the Chief Magistrate of Cowtown for a long time.
But, more importantly to this story, Mr. Carter also worked for a spell for Ms. Smith and the Wildrose Party, where the financial troubles of his company were known.
Mr. Carter told the Sun Ms. Smith knew about his money troubles. Ms. Smith also indicated to the paper she was aware of them. With its support withering in the polls, the Wildrose Party is clearly prepared to play hard and dirty to win, as the creepy U.S.-style video ads it released last Thursday and its cynical on-line advertising illustrate.

Only Mr. Bell, of course, can say who told him about this story, and when. And even he may not know his source’s motivations.
All this said, any attempt to blow this off as insignificant or to stall is not going to wash.
According to another Sun report, published on the paper’s website this evening, a spokesperson for the new premier’s office said Mr. Carter had made an appointment with Alberta’s Ethics Commissioner to discuss the situation before the story broke. The premier’s office will wait on the commissioner’s report before it decides what to do, said Jay O’Neill.
Alas, the author of this story is an excellent reporter trained by the very best in the field – that is to say, he was once one of my own journalism students at the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology in Calgary. So I have to tell you, I trust this story too.
If there’s an axiom about political staff, it’s that they must never embarrass the politician they work for.
Unfortunately for Mr. Carter, as unfair as this all may turn out to be, if he doesn’t resign, his presence will continue to be a festering political problem for his boss.
Wasn’t everything supposed to change when Alberta’s unlucky 13th premier left office and No. 14 took over?
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.
10 comments:
I am baffled that the Herald and Journal are ignoring this story.
Any theories as to why?
"…The Sun is a tabloid newspaper that in recent years, apparently on the orders of its parent company in Quebec, has taken a hard turn to the right…" Both Suns, in fact, but sadly this effect has spilled over into their small-city & rural stablemates. Formerly owned by the locally-based Bowes Publishing, the Grande Prairie Daily Herald-Tribune has seen its editorial policy shift dramatically to the right as its new parent QMI asserts more control than in the past. Most of its opinion pieces are taken verbatim from the Edmonton Sun, as well as much of its highly slanted provincial and federal coverage. Particularly odious is their participation in the QMI crusade against the CBC, who are after all their journalistic competitors.
The only reason we (reluctantly) renewed our subscription this year was because of local coverage. The Journal isn't going to cover what goes on at Grande Prairie City Hall or the County office, for example.
While they were a little more gentle in their approach the Globe ran the story on Thursday.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/company-owned-by-redfords-chief-of-staff-defaults-on-court-ordered-payments/article2193853/
This is old news. See this Globe story from November 2009:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/high-profile-member-of-wildrose-party-resigns/article1376291/
The situation now is simply that the (same) news that led to Carter resigning from his job as Danielle Smith's chief of staff is unlikely to lead to his resigning from his job as Alison Redford's chief of staff. The critical difference being that Carter was giving up little to quit Wildrose, whereas the premier's chief of staff has in recent years been a $300K+ a year gig. Something that lucrative will not be surrendered easily!
A problematic line from the 2009 story is the claim that Carter's "accounting is just an absolute mess." This may not be a problem for a campaign strategist but it is a problem when the chief of staff controls access to the premier's attention. People complaining about budget issues are not going to be confident that Carter "gets" what their complaint is if he has a history of not "getting" it with respect to his private business.
And who spoon fed Bell the story? Might it have been Mr. Carter's former boss? (That would be Danielle Smith)
As for Bell's objectivity, every story he writes, regarding provincial politics, he writes with his Wildrose colored glasses on..
=
The Sun is now a extreme right wing paper and everything else is just fluff. This paper now tells its readers to vote for the right and openly insults everyone else. A lot of its writers are the Don Cherrys of journalism.
David this is not bad luck. I doubt very much that Alison Redford did not know all of this about Carter. Politicians like the mafia wives intentionally ask no questions as long as results keep happening and for most of them, with an ego the size of a typical CN train, that is all that counts. The subsequent surprises are met with theatrical reactions that clearly define the state of politics not just here but in the so called Democratic world.
I doubt the story is not true. The Sun would not take that big of a risk. Also this must have come, like it was suggested, from Danielle Smith one of the new godesses of the right wing oracle.
Curious to see where this is heading although I predict that Alison is going to be in deep trouble if she calls for a public inquire on the Health care queue jumping.
@ Brian Dell
How is it old news?
Has he paid back the money?
It's 'new' in that he is now in charge of a $30 billion operation, instead of a mom and pop opposition shop.
Lawyers with this kind of debt are forced to stop practicing because it shows a breach of trust. Yet this behavior is OK for a Premier's Chief of Staff?
It's interesting how only the Globe and Mail story bothers to make a distinction between personal debts and company debts. No one of these professional journalists have investigated whether Carter-McCrae is a limited company, legally responsible for its own debts while insolvent and unable to pay, or a partnership or some other legal form for which the principals assume the responsibility for the partnership's debts. Why do you suppose corporations are formed? They are called limited companies because their obligations are limited to the company, not its owners. It may well be that Stephen Carter has no obligation to the company's debtors. None of the stories make this clear. It appears the company's debts are due to it being stiffed by another organizer.
We need better information before we get all excited.
Curmudgeon-at-Large is correct and I for one have no idea whether the story is true or not. I assumed the paper would not take that risk but maybe I am being naive about it.
I will wait and see despite the fact that the whole story is too weird to me. I have a hard time that a person like Alison Redford with obviously knowledge of law would not know about all of this.
David wrote that: the Calgary Sun reports that a company owned by her new chief of staff, ...“owes more than $600,000, most of it to the University of Calgary, and hasn’t coughed up a cent in court-ordered judgments.”
Pretty clear, it's his company with the debt. People incorporate so they aren't responsible for the debt personally if the company fails. A small, 2 person company is 2 people getting work for themselves and a few staff.
Post a Comment