Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Governor General must act decisively to protect the cherished Order of Canada

Conrad Black, back in the day, lectures a Calgary Herald employee for having the temerity to engage in a legal strike. Mr. Black’s effort to have his subsequent U.S. criminal convictions overturned was rejected yesterday by the U.S. Supreme Court. Below: Governor General David Johnston, wearing his Order of Canada gong.

Governor General David Johnston is a distinguished lawyer, so he surely understands the importance of precedent, both as a practical and symbolic matter.

Now, early in his term as Canada’s vice-regal personage, Mr. Johnston is faced with the urgent need to act decisively to protect a cherished Canadian institution.

I speak, of course, of the Order of Canada, and the pressing requirement that the notorious and unrepentant felon, Conrad Moffat Black, lately a resident of Coleman, Fla., be removed from the ranks of the Order’s membership post-haste.

It is mildly ironic and powerfully symbolic that Mr. Black, also known as Baron Black of Crossharbour, failed yesterday in his continuous and apparently well-funded efforts to have the United States Supreme Court overturn his 2007 conviction for fraud and obstruction of justice less than a week after 43 distinguished Canadians were invested with the nation’s highest civilian honour in a ceremony at Rideau Hall.

In 2007, Mr. Black was found guilty by a jury in Chicago of defrauding Hollinger Inc., the publicly held newspaper holding company that he led, and sentenced to six and a half years in the federal institution at Coleman.

Since then, it has been argued here and elsewhere that the former newspaper owner’s continued presence as an Officer of the Order of Canada, which he was awarded in 1990, is a stain on this hallowed national institution. However, for reasons known only to herself and her close advisors, whomever they may have been, the previous Governor General declined to use her prerogative as the chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order to purge it of this blot.

The suggestion has been made, though never officially confirmed, that the Governor General’s staff at Rideau Hall were waiting for Mr. Black’s attempts to clear his name to run their course. This has now happened, and there is no excuse for allowing this convicted criminal to remain an Officer of the Order.

Last fall, a U.S. appeals court upheld Mr. Black’s conviction on one count of fraud, as well as for obstructing justice, while overturning two other fraud convictions against the former Canadian.

Mr. Black had renounced his citizenship in 2001 because the government of what he called this “Third World dump run by raving socialists” would not allow him to accept a British baronetcy. This minor title of British nobility entitled Mr. Black to a seat in the House of Lords. Apparently this sort of foreign frippery was more important to the former Toronto resident than the honour of being a Canadian citizen.

After the fall ruling by the American appeals court, counsel for Mr. Black proceeded to the U.S. Supreme Court proclaiming their intention to see the remaining charges overturned. Yesterday, however, the Justices of the Supreme Court refused to hear Mr. Black’s arguments in a brief order, unaccompanied by further commentary.

This means that Mr. Black must return to court in Chicago on June 24 for re-sentencing on the two convictions that still stand.

Mr. Black, who continues to refuse to take responsibility for the actions for which he was criminally convicted in our neighbouring democracy, a country where the Canadian government is clearly persuaded the rule of law prevails with regard to the treatment of Canadian citizens, has made blustering statements that he will continue the fight to remain at large.

Perhaps he may succeed. After two and a half years in jail and the U.S. Supreme Court’s earlier redefinition of the legal theory used to convict him, he may very well be deemed to have served enough time for his crimes already. But whether or not the door to the room where Mr. Black lays his head at night is barred is not the issue here.

He is in fact a person who departed “from generally recognized standards of public behaviour” and who was “convicted of a criminal offense,” both grounds for revocation of membership in the Order under Article 3 of the Policy and Procedure for Termination of Appointment to the Order Of Canada.

We among the hoi polloi know this, because this was precisely the argument advanced by Mr. Johnston’s predecessor as Governor General in 2010 when she gave the tragic one-legged runner and cancer fund-raiser Steve Fonyo the bum’s rush from the Order after a series of minor criminal convictions.

Arguably, Mr. Fonyo made a more valuable contribution to Canadian life than the fractious Mr. Black.

Regardless, hockey commentator Howie Meeker, musician Robbie Robertson and actor and fund-raiser Michael J. Fox, all invested in the Order last Friday, are great Canadians. Conrad Black is not. Indeed, Mr. Black is not even a Canadian!

It is time for Mr. Johnston to earn his salary and strike Mr. Black’s name from the rolls of the Order forthwith! Anything less disgraces the Order.

This post also appears on rabble.ca.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nope. Absolutely not. The retro-active judge-athon is ridiculous. Look at what happened to Steve Fonio. Life is hard. Stuff happens. Stripping him of his O of C was vile and cruel. Where does it stop? The theo-cons oust Morgentaller? If you get an O of C, do you have to sit under glass for the rest of your days? The O of C is not a court. You may dislike Mr. Black all you like, but the biggest dishonour to the O of C would be to start using it as a way to humiliate people be revoking their previous honour.

Filostrato said...

I heard that Black's lawsuit-a-thon had finally screeched to a halt the other day. Various headlines said that his appeal had failed. To my mind, he had very little appeal in the first place.

I'm not altogether sure what he got his Order for in the first place. Services to newspaper baronetcy, perhaps? The National Post, as we all know, continues to be a roaring success - somewhere in a parallel universe, perhaps.

We may become a nation of Lady Macbeths, driven to distraction if Black is not purged from the rolls.

"Out, damn'd spot! out, I say!"

Black's opinion of Canada, that it is a "Third World dump run by raving socialists” sounds very much like Harper's.

As if either cared.

Lady Macbeth again:

"What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our
pow'r to accompt?"

Anonymous said...

The biggest problem with the O of C is that it comes from the queen of england through her lapdog GG and NOT from the people of Canada.

David Harrigan said...

Sorry, David, I have to agree with Anonymous on this one. (the first Anonymous, not the other one - they are often confused because they have the same name.)

He should have never been awarded it, but he was. To suggest that because some court in some other country made a ruling about the law in their land, Canada should take action on an award for its (sometime) citizens is not acceptable.

Fonyo is a perfect example - that was vile and cruel. And Morgentaller was found guilty by a court.

Revoking any honour makes no sense.

Oh - it's "hoi polloi" not "the hoi polloi"

(couldn't resist!)

Carlos Beca said...

So to those who agree that we should not take it back I ask the question - Someone calls Canada a thirld world dump, renounces his nationality to accept the title of Lord and should keep the Order of Canada? What kind of respect do you have for your nation? Well again we have a prime minister that pretty much agrees with him! Maybe you are right afterall. I am sorry to have asked you the question. Filostrato is right.

Anonymous said...

The Order of Canada is less an honour than a reward for friends of the Government. It has no real meaning when given to actors who have not lived in Canada since before the O of C's inception. Lets accept it for what it is - a piece of jewelry given (with some exceptions) for little real effort. Mr Fonyo and Mr Black did not earn the honour in the first place, so there is little reason to take it back since it has no prima facia value.